Why Do Babies Hate Getting Their Nose and Face Wiped???

I have often been asked this question by parents... and even more so by my wife as we try to clean the snot off our little kids' noses as they shriek as if we're torturing them.

Given it seems ALL young kids have this nose-wiping aversion across cultures and racial ethnicities, it would seem that this reflex reaction is hard-wired into human babies. But why would evolution favor this reaction?

I tried to find an answer to this question to see if any bright researchers actually studied this topic, but was unable to find any. So... here are my thoughts on this topic.

To warn other healthy humans

Evolutionarily, it may have been helpful for the human population as a whole if it was obvious to others when an individual was sick. To see a toddler with snot running out the nose, that would have been a pretty clear sign for other children and their parents to stay away lest they also get sick. This isolation of a sick child would have been nature's way of quarantining to prevent spread of illness to the rest of the human group.

To get eaten by predators

Not to be morbid, but predators tend to feed on the sick. It is nature's cruel way of removing the weakest in an animal population which over time will only strengthen the prey animal population as a whole (Darwin's theory of only the fittest survive). Back in the REALLY old days (caveman era), sick humans would have been just such a prey that would have been targeted by wild predator animals. To be not just a young human, but one that also shows signs of illness would be indicators to a predator of who to go after.

Protect the airway

This is my wife's favorite theory who feels the last idea to be horrible and inhuman (never mind that just because evolution is horrible and inhuman does not make it false). This airway idea is based on the fact that breathing is essential to life. Anything that covers the nose or mouth, even briefly, is a potential hazard that may lead to death. Evolutionarily, this reflex would be favored and strengthened over time... even if avoidance involves just a quick wipe. Who knows? Perhaps SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) would be much more prevalent if the nose/face wipe aversion was not present.

Any other ideas? Even better, does anybody know of any studies that actually looked into this topic?

Read More

Nasal Spray Cure for the Common Cold?

Well maybe not cure per se, but at least effective treatment to reduce the duration and severity of the viral cold at least. Austrian researchers have reported on the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 211 patients suffering from early symptoms of the common cold. [link]

Treatment of the non-placebo group involved using a nasal spray containing carrageenan (a sulphated polysaccharide found in red seaweed/algae) three times per day for 7 days. Cold symptoms were found to resolve 2.1 days faster and viral loads in the nasal washings were significantly decreased compared to placebo group. At day 21 of observation, one sixth of patients given the placebo were still ill, while only one twentieth were in the treatment group.

Personally, I would like to see larger studies conducted by other independent groups to verify the findings.

So how does this nasal spray work?

The problem with the common cold is that there are SO many viruses that manifest the same disease including rhinovirus, coronavirus, parainfluenza, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, enterovirus, and metapneumovirus. As such, an effective treatment should be able to disable all these virus types and not just one.

The way carrageenan works is by sticking to the virus regardless of type and preventing it from attaching to the nasal lining. As such, the virus is unable to enter into the body and cause problems. It essentially blocks the virus like the wall of a castle.

The caveat is that in order for this nasal spray to work, you have to start using the medication as soon as cold symptoms appear (within 2 days). Remember... it works by blocking the virus from entering the body. If you wait too long, the virus has already entered the body making any type of blocking medication ineffective.

Where can you buy it?

It is available over-the-counter in most European countries and Canada. But NOT available in the United States.

The nasal spray is made by Marinomed in Europe using their Mavirex technology and also licensed for marketing/distribution by Boehringer. Carragelose is the brand name of the carrageenan ingredient. Depending on the country, the actual name of the nasal spray is sold under is different.

For example, in England, the nasal spray is called "Cold and Flu Defence Nasal Spray".

To make sure you have the right nasal spray, look under ingredients and make sure carragelose is listed.

On another note... Afrin nasal spray has also been shown to have some anti-viral activity in unpublished reports. Just be aware to not use it more than 3 days or else you may get addicted to it.


References:
Efficacy of a Carrageenan nasal spray in patients with common cold: a randomized controlled trial. Respiratory Research 2013, 14:124 doi:10.1186/1465-9921-14-124

Efficacy and safety of an antiviral Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study in volunteers with early symptoms of the common cold. Respir Res 2010. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-11-108

Lessons learned from a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study with a iota-carrageenan nasal spray as medical device in children with acute symptoms of common cold. BMC Complement Altern Med 2012. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-147

Read More

Lawsuit Alleges Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Paralyzed Patient's Face

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics is being sued by a patient who underwent an experimental transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy which allegedly caused a facial paralysis which was than negligently treated. The trial is scheduled for Oct 13, 2013. [link]

Briefly, the patient in 2008 underwent experimental TMS to treat constipation and incontinence. TMS is a noninvasive method to cause depolarization or hyperpolarization in the neurons of the brain using pulses of electromagnetic induction through the scalp. Researchers were hoping to learn more about the nerve connections between the brain and the rectum and how biofeedback training may affect them.

Unfortunately, the patient contended that the treatment gave her a severe headache and by the next day, a facial paralysis. She went to the emergency room and was given an anti-viral antibiotic to take, but no steroids.

Her facial paralysis worsened and she ultimately underwent facial nerve decompression surgery 12 days later which helped with her taste loss, but not her facial paralysis.

The lawsuit contends that:
1) The patient was not informed of the risks of TMS as it relates to facial paralysis
2) Steroids should have been prescribed and the patient immediately referred for nerve decompression surgery

Does TMS carry a risk of facial paralysis?

I honestly do not know much about TMS, but I can certainly state that I've never heard of TMS causing or carrying a risk of facial paralysis. In fact, TMS is used to evaluate facial paralysis by being able to assess the integrity of the facial nerve as well as predict its potential for regeneration after injury [link].

Hypothetically, could TMS cause cranial nerve injury and swelling leading to facial paralysis??? I suppose so, but will defer to people more knowledgeable than I to answer this question.

The timing is certainly suspicious in this case with paralysis occurring within 24 hours of TMS.

But if it can, it certainly is worth a published case report.

Even more importantly, patients who are currently undergoing TMS to evaluate their facial paralysis now need to be warned of the risk that the TMS test itself may make their facial paralysis even worse!!!

What about steroids?

Although some may consider medical management of facial paralysis still controversial, I personally feel that steroids SHOULD have been immediately prescribed without any anti-virals.

The current preponderance of evidence is that anti-virals make absolutely no difference in the treatment of facial paralysis... even when the facial paralysis is due to a virus [link].  I personally do not prescribe anti-virals for patients with facial paralysis regardless of etiology.

What about steroids? Moderate quality evidence show that steroids were significantly more likely than anti-virals to produce complete recovery [link #1; link #2]. I always prescribe steroids to treat facial paralysis.

What about facial nerve decompression surgery?

Now surgical decompression of the facial nerve can be considered controversial. Decompression entails removing part of the skull, moving the brain to one side slightly, and removing all bone covering the facial nerve.

The theory being that if the facial nerve is swollen as it courses through the skull from the brain to the face, strangulation followed by nerve death occurs. To use an analogy, if a finger starts to swell from trauma, a ring being worn may prevent blood flow and eventually cause strangulation of the finger. Treatment to reestablish finger blood flow is to cut the ring off. Facial nerve decompression is akin to cutting a ring off to save a swollen finger.

Typically, surgical decompression of the facial nerve is pursued when facial paralysis occurs in the context of physical head trauma (ie, car accident). In the absence of preceding physical trauma, it would be the rare surgeon who would recommend surgical facial nerve decompression.

Obviously, the main question related to this lawsuit is whether nerve swelling occurred due to the TMS therapy necessitating surgical decompression. Presumably, an MRI scan was performed showing a highly inflamed and swollen facial nerve as well as significant nerve degeneration on ENoG testing. Supporting evidence (not mentioned in media reports) would be if profound hearing loss also occurred. Why? Because the facial nerve and hearing nerve both go through the same boney canal.

Malpractice?

TMS is not known to cause facial paralysis. As such, in a normal situation, this particular risk would not be expected to be included in the consent (as it has not been previously described). However, given this therapy was provided in the context of an experimental research protocol, the consent process is much more rigorous with much higher standards. With such higher standards, should risks never before seen be also included in the consent, especially if TMS has been performed many times for other purposes??? I don't know...

Certainly, my feeling as an ENT specialist is that steroids should have been given and not an anti-viral medication. Whether ENT specialist standards should apply to emergency room staff is harder to say.

Without more information, negligence as it pertains to delayed surgical facial nerve decompression is also hard to say.

Ultimately, we shall see what the court decides.


Source:
Lawsuit alleges Iowa doctors left patient's face paralyzed. Associated Press 8/13/13

References:
Transcranial magnetic therapy. Wikipedia

Electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve: diagnostic relevance in acute isolated facial nerve palsy. Eur Neurol. 2012;68(5):304-9. doi: 10.1159/000341624.

Antiviral therapy for Ramsay Hunt syndrome (herpes zoster oticus with facial palsy) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD006851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006851.pub2.

Antiviral treatment for Bell's palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD001869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001869.pub4.

Do either corticosteroids or antiviral agents reduce the risk of long-term facial paresis in patients with new-onset Bell's palsy? J Emerg Med. 2010 May;38(4):518-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

Read More

Dr. Chang Quoted in Voice Council Magazine

Dr. Christopher Chang was quoted in a Nov 4, 2012 article published in Voice Council Magazine.

The Voice Council Magazine is based out of United Kingdom and focuses on "practical insight for the emerging vocalist."

The article by Megan Gloss was focused on why Celine Dion cancelled her concert 2/22/12 in Las Vegas (a viral laryngitis), a subject I already blogged about here.

Read the published Voice Council article here.

Source:
Celine Dion's Viral Voice. Voice Council Magazine 2/22/12.

Viral Infections and Singing — More From Dr. Chang. Voice Council Magazine 2/22/12.

Read More

"Bitter" Taste Sense Contributes to Immune Defense

As children, we all learned about the 4 different taste qualities the human tongue can appreciate: salty, sugar, bitter, and sour. Savory or umami was added in 1985. "Calcium" has been proposed in 2008 as well as more recently, "fatty" taste.

However, we are slowly learning that "taste" is much more complex than simply the ability to perceive the taste qualities associated with food.

That tongue map we all memorized in elementary school? It's a lie... Read more here.

But even cooler... the "bitter" taste may actually help fight infections!

University of Pennsylvania researchers have discovered that the bitter taste receptor T2R38 also participates in upper airway immune defense.

They demonstrated that the T2R38 receptor was expressed in the upper respiratory tract lining and could be activated by molecules (acyl-homoserine lactone) secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative bacteria (staph and strep are gram-positive bacteria). When the receptor is activated, it stimulates muco-ciliary clearance and initiates direct cellular antibacterial effects.

Furthermore, small mutations in the T2R38 gene had a direct influence on the frequency of bacterial sinus infections.

These findings may explain WHY some patients are more prone to getting infections versus another patient... It's because of their bitter taste receptor!

Reference:
T2R38 taste receptor polymorphisms underlie susceptibility to upper respiratory infection. J Clin Invest. doi:10.1172/JCI64240.

Read More

Celine Dion Cancels Shows Due to Laryngitis

In late Feb 2012, Celine Dion who was to have performed in Las Vegas Feb 22, 2012, cancelled her show at the last minute at the Caesar's Palace due to laryngitis on the advice of her doctors. According to media reports, her doctors instructed her to rest for 7 days to ensure full recovery due to vocal cord inflammation caused by a virus.

What does that mean exactly?

When a virus infects the mucosa of the upper airway, it causes inflammation of the mucosa lining including the vocal cords. With inflammation, the vocal cords swell.

That's why with laryngitis, the pitch of the voice decreases and it becomes more effortful to talk. To use an analogy, think of a violin string where the thicker string has a deeper pitch than a thin string. It also takes more power to play the thicker string. Watch the video below of normal vocal cord functioning:


In order for voice production to occur, the lining of the vocal cords vibrates very quickly when they come together. If the vocal cords are swollen, they don't vibrate as easily.

Here's what inflamed vocal cords might have looked like for Celine Dion. Note the slight bend to the vocal cords and overall dull appearance.

Below is what her vocal cords might look like when they are at peak health!

Voice rest is absolutely important for vocal recovery as quickly as possible. With talking/singing during active laryngitis, further trauma may occur to the vocal cord lining promoting even more inflammation and swelling. It may also lead to another vocal disorder known as muscle tension dysphonia.


Source:
Celine Dion cancels act: laryngitis. UPI 2/26/12

Read More

Natural Remedies for a Sore Throat, Cough, and Viral Infections

Homeopathy and alternative medicine often get a bum rap, but they have come up with some treatments for sore throats and upper respiratory viral illnesses that actually have been proven to work.

Here's a few...

1) Honey

Sore throats (and coughing) can be soothed by swallowing honey straight-up or slightly diluted with warm water with honey to make it easier to swallow. The best time to do this is at bedtime given it will stick around for awhile (eating/drinking will wash away the coating). The purpose of honey is to create a throat barrier to ease the discomfort.

Think of it like chapstick to coat irritated lips, but meant for the throat.

Use of honey is also recommended by the World Health Organization which has also published a monogram on viral colds and the various treatments explained. Pay particular close attention to Annex 3 (Page 11) which gives various recipes to treat pediatric cough including the use of honey.

Reference:
Effect of Honey, Dextromethorphan, and No Treatment on Nocturnal Cough and Sleep Quality for Coughing Children and Their Parents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(12):1140-1146.

2) Humidification

Dry cool air increases risk of viral infections as well as giving it to others. As such, add room humidification to a bedroom and keep the door closed (small room humidifiers can't humidify an entire house... so keep door closed!).

Why does this help? Increased humidification inactivates viruses!

Humidification also helps minimize a persistent dry cough worse at night often due to reactive airway disease triggered by breathing in dry air.

However, keep in mind that if you actively have a viral illness, it is too late for humidity to help. It is best used as a preventative measure.

Reference:
Dynamics of airborne influenza A viruses indoors and dependence on humidity. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21481. Epub 2011 Jun 24. Influenza virus transmission is dependent on relative humidity and temperature. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e151.

Heated, humidified air for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11;(5):CD001728.

3) Gargling and Saline Flushes

Gargle with saline water... or even just tap-water on a daily basis. Why does this help prevent viral infections? It washes away the viral particles before it gets a chance to cause problems.

It's also probably why drinking lots of fluids also helps since the viruses get deactivated in the stomach from the acidic digestion.

Unfortunately, gargling only helps with the throat... saline flushes are required to help with sino-nasal problems.

Reference:
Can we prevent influenza-like illnesses by gargling? Intern Med. 2007;46(18):1623-4. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

4) Xylitol

This naturally-occurring sugar substitute apparently has all sorts of anti-bacterial as well as anti-fungal properties and has been known to doctors and scientists but hardly marketed or promoted in any fashion.

However, the importance of this compound is that it DOES appear to significantly decrease the incidence of ear infections and sinus infections when used regularly. It comes in nasal spray form as well as gum.

Reference:

Xylitol as a prophylaxis for acute otitis media: systematic review. Int J Audiol. 2010 Oct;49(10):754-61.

A novel use of xylitol sugar in preventing acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4 Pt 1):879-84.

Xylitol chewing gum in prevention of acute otitis media: double blind randomised trial. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1180-4.

Failure of xylitol given three times a day for preventing acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 May;26(5):423-7.

Xylitol administered only during respiratory infections failed to prevent acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2):E19.

Conclusion

Sometimes the BEST medicine are things you can do at home without need for a physician visit... and is based on fact rather than anecdotal evidence.

Read More